污染物排放标准对碳排放标准的司法功能借鉴与延伸  

Reference and Extension of Pollutant Emission Standards to the Judicial Function of Carbon Emission Standards

作　　者：石鑫鉴 

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第6期5596-5607,共12页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：我国碳排放相关标准体系正在逐步建立健全。对碳排放标准的研究脱胎于环境标准,通过对比研究,发现目前碳排放标准在司法中运用少,但其与传统环境标准的天然相合性使得其对我们研究碳排放标准在司法实践中的功能有不少借鉴之处。通过对比可发现,碳排放标准有科学实用性及行政规范性,但缺乏法律拘束力。本研究选择污染物排放标准作为研究桥梁并分析相关案例,发现碳排放标准在司法实践中具有事实认定、性质界定、解释补充功能。基于碳排放标准自身特质的延伸,还有社会引导、完善立法功能。兼顾审视司法实践中的问题,以助推碳排放标准体系完善,使得碳排放标准与司法实践相互促进,为更好地实现碳达峰碳中和的目标保驾护航。China’s carbon emission-related standard system is gradually being established and improved. The research on carbon emission standards is derived from environmental standards. Through comparative research, it is found that the current carbon emission standards are rarely used in the ju-diciary, but its natural compatibility with traditional environmental standards makes it have a lot of references for us to study the function of carbon emission standards in judicial practice. Through comparison, it can be found that carbon emission standards are scientific, practical and administrative normative, but lack legal constraints. In this study, pollutant emission standards were selected as a research bridge and analyzed relevant cases, and found that carbon emission standards have the functions of fact determination, nature definition and supplementary interpretation in judicial practice. Based on the extension of the characteristics of carbon emission standards, there is also the function of social guidance and improvement. To examine the problems in judicial practice to boost the improvement of the carbon emission standard system, so that carbon emission standards and judicial practice promote each other, so as to better achieve the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality.

关 键 词：环境标准 碳排放标准 司法适用 功能借鉴 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]