检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川轻化工大学法学院,四川 自贡
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5608-5615,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:司法确认制度在深化诉源治理、完善多元化纠纷解决机制的过程中具有重要作用,从诉源治理的视角进行审视,司法确认制度在不断发展的同时,依然存在许多有待完善的问题。对此,应该对司法确认制度中的不足对症下药,赋予一方当事人申请权,明确审查标准,同时允许案外人提出第三人撤销之诉以完善救济途径,最后推动多元化纠纷解决机制的建设,不断完善与发展这项中国特色社会主义司法制度,使其更好地服务于诉源治理工作,促进国家治理体系和治理能力的现代化。The judicial confirmation system plays an important role in deepening the governance of the source of litigation and improving the diversified dispute resolution mechanism. From the perspective of the governance of the source of litigation, it can be seen that while the judicial confirmation system continues to develop, there are still many problems to be improved. In this regard, the inadequacy of the judicial confirmation system should be remedied, a party should be given the right to apply, and the examination criteria should be clearly defined the outsiders put forward the third-party revocation lawsuit to improve the relief channels, and finally promote the construction of diversified dispute resolution mechanism, constantly improve and develop the socialist judicial system with Chinese characteristics, so that it can better serve the governance of the source of litigation, and promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33