检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗金
机构地区:[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏 镇江
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5777-5784,共8页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:自“双减”政策实施以来,教育培训行业成为国家重点规范调整的领域,但是在规范的过程中仍然存在不少死角,尤其是在大学生兼职课程培训、考研课程培训等方面。从281例法律咨询记录的分析结果来看,教育机构在培训过程中存在虚假承诺,引诱学生使用贷款缴纳培训费用,不合理计算退课费用,故意约定仲裁条款增加学生维权成本等问题。化解该类法律风险需要多方合力,增加学生法律意识,政府加大对于教育行业的整顿,制定教育培训行业模板合同,充分发挥高校法律援助力量。Since the implementation of the “double reduction” policy, the education and training industry has become a key area for national regulation and adjustment. However, there are still many blind spots in the process of regulation, especially in the training of part-time courses for college students and postgraduate entrance exams. From the analysis of 281 legal consultation records, it can be seen that educational institutions have made false promises during the training process, induced students to use loans to pay training fees, unreasonably calculated dropout fees, and intentionally agreed arbitration clauses to increase the cost of student rights protection. Resolving such legal risks requires joint efforts from multiple parties to increase students’ legal awareness. The government will increase its efforts to rectify the education industry, develop template contracts for the education and training industry, and fully leverage the legal aid capabilities of universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120