检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈翠婷
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5891-5897,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:保辜制度是中国古代特有的纠纷解决机制,其从产生和发展,再到成熟完备经历了千年之久。在唐代正式入律后,保辜制度逐渐成熟和完善,唐律对其进行了系统和详细的规定。本文以《唐律疏议》中的保辜制度为研究对象,通过文献研究、历史研究、案例分析的方法,从了解唐代保辜制度的规定和运行入手,研究其所具有的特点。保辜制度虽然包含了伟大的东方哲学思想和古人的立法智慧,但其毕竟是古代生产力落后的社会背景下的产物,因此本文在系统认识唐代保辜制度的基础上,将分析其合理之处和存在的缺陷。其中合理之处所体现的立法智慧不仅能为当今所用,同时也是我们增强法律文化自信的一个典范,而其缺陷之处也当进行理性分析,以做到取其精华,去其糟粕。The victim protection system is a unique dispute settlement mechanism in ancient China, which has experienced thousands of years from its emergence and development to maturity. After the formal entry into the law in the Tang Dynasty, the system was gradually mature and perfect, and the law of the Tang Dynasty made systematic and detailed stipulations on it. This paper takes the victim protection system in the law of the Tang Dynasty as the research object, through the methods of literature research, historical research and case analysis, from the understanding of the provisions and operation of the victim protection system in the Tang Dynasty, and studies its characteristics. Although the system contains the great Oriental philosophy and the ancient legislative wisdom, it is the product of the social background of the backward productivity in ancient times. Therefore, based on the systematic understanding of the system in the Tang Dynasty, this paper will analyze its reasonableness and defects. The legislative wisdom embodied in the reasonable part is not only applicable for today, but also a model for us to enhance the confidence of the legal culture. The defects should also be rationally analyzed, so as to select the essence and discard the dross.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.82.212