检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许秀
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2023年第6期5898-5903,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:死刑复核程序作为被告人最后一道救济程序,被告人的诉讼权利应当得到充分尊重和保障。由于死刑复核程序的法律援助规定简单,不足以保障被告人的辩护权行使。强制辩护制度是保障被追诉人诉讼权利、维护司法公正的重要刑事诉讼制度。强制辩护的根本目的在于保障人权,理论基础在于无罪推定和程序正义。因此,死刑复核程序的强制辩护对于保护被告人诉讼权利和促进程序正义和实体正义均具有重大理论意义和实践意义。As the last relief procedure for the defendant, the death penalty review procedure should fully respect and protect their litigation rights. Due to the simple legal aid regulations in the death penalty review process, they are insufficient to protect the defendant’s right to defense. The compulsory defense system is an important criminal litigation system that guarantees the litigation rights of the accused and maintains judicial fairness. The fundamental purpose of compulsory defense is to protect human rights, and the theoretical basis is the presumption of innocence and procedural justice. Therefore, the compulsory defense of the death penalty review procedure has significant theoretical and practical significance for protecting the defendant’s litigation rights and promoting procedural and substantive justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38