论作为“行动”的量刑:阿伦特理论视野下的量刑程序  

On Sentencing as an Action: Sentencing Procedure from the Perspective of Arendt’s Theory

作　　者：谭芃 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2023年第6期6412-6421,共10页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：量刑行动是一种法律实践行动,不仅仅沟通了实体法和程序法,更是沟通了刑事法的两大核心:定罪与求刑,因而极具理论和实践意义,值得被反复讨论。在上一轮的研究潮流中,我们看到的是关于量刑程序改革的技术性层面的关注和行动,量刑行动的政治行动的本质并没有被发现和关注,在这样的理论关切的背景下,比较法范式成为支配刑事诉讼法研究的统治性研究范式,量刑改革在两大法系的对垒中寻找自身的参照系,是一个由他者的否定性建构起来的自我,因而是一种概念的理论,而没有能回归到量刑行动的“事情自身”和实践特征。回应刑事诉讼行动的现代性特征,需要把它作为一种政治行动进行思考,把它自身的技术性特征和行动本质区分开来,从而为人类的法律生活提供正确的指南。Sentencing action is a legal practice action that not only communicates substantive law and procedural law, but also communicates the two core elements of criminal law: conviction and sentencing. Therefore, it has great theoretical and practical significance and is worth mentioning again. In the previous round of research, we saw a focus and action on the technical level of sentencing procedure reform. The essence of political action in sentencing action has not been discovered and paid atten-tion to. Against this theoretical concern, the comparative law paradigm has become the dominant research paradigm in the study of criminal litigation law. Sentencing reform seeks its own reference frame in the confrontation between the two legal systems, it is a self constructed by the negation of others, and therefore a conceptual theory without returning to the “thing itself” and practical characteristics of sentencing actions. In response to the modern characteristics of criminal litigation ac-tion, it is necessary to consider it as a political action, distinguish its own technical characteristics from the essence of action, and provide correct guidance for human legal life.

关 键 词：量刑 量刑规范化 量刑程序 量刑规则 阿伦特 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]