检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙文宣
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏 扬州
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第2期849-855,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:近些年来,随着我国反垄断执法机构的逐步整合、立法实践的日渐丰富以及司法实践的确切落实,都体现了我国在反垄断法域外适用制度完善方面的不懈努力,但是否能够真正有效解决反垄断法域外适用的国际冲突和维护本国利益的难题,还不得而知。本文就我国反垄断法域外适用的立法、执法和司法现状分析我国反垄断域外适用制度的不足之处,以及通过加强双边合作、区域合作、多边合作并提高我国应对外国政府反垄断执法和诉讼的能力方面来缓解反垄断法域外适用的困境。In recent years, with the integration of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies, the enrichment of legislative practice and the implementation of judicial practice, China has demonstrated its unremitting efforts in improving the system of extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law, but whether it can effectively solve the international conflicts of extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law and safeguard national interests is still unknown. This paper analyzes the shortcomings of our country’s anti-monopoly extraterritorial application system in terms of legislation, enforcement and judicial status, and alleviates the dilemma of extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law by strengthening bilateral cooperation, regional cooperation and multilateral cooperation and improving our ability to deal with foreign governments’ anti-monopoly law enforcement and litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31