检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:莫庆录
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第3期1454-1460,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:行政复议和行政诉讼是保护国民合法利益的重要救济手段,他们的重要性是毫无疑问的,他们的重要性。行政复议和行政诉讼都是行政立法的重要内容,是行政合作伙伴申请行政救济的两种主要方式。在制度设计过程中,应该对其目的和用途进行精准定位,以保证实际应用效果。现今社会,人们越来越注重个人自由,只有保证行政相对人有足够的主动权及选择权,他们才能申请行政审查和行政诉讼。从行政复议和行政诉讼的角度来看,说明只有二者合理衔接才能更好地保护和救济国民合法权益,本文阐述它们二者衔接的必要性和现状,并从证据、适用范围、程序三方面来分析完善。Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation are important remedies for protecting the legitimate interests of citizens, and their importance is beyond doubt. Administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation are both important contents of administrative legislation and the two main ways for administrative partners to apply for administrative relief. In the process of institutional design, its purpose and purpose should be accurately positioned to ensure practical application effectiveness. In today's society, people are increasingly valuing personal freedom. Only by ensuring that administrative counterparties have sufficient initiative and choice can they apply for administrative review and litigation. From the perspective of administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, it is demonstrated that only a reasonable connection between the two can better protect and remedy the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. This article elaborates on the necessity and current situation of their connection, and analyzes and improves them from three aspects: evidence, scope of application, and procedural sequence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222