检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨惠萍
机构地区:[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州 贵阳
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第3期1603-1609,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:法律是一定社会历史发展的产物,因此准确适用法律的前提需要进行解释。而刑法解释的方法主要有文义解释、目的解释、体系解释等。随着刑法学的不断发展,刑法学界关注重点逐渐转移到刑法解释学上,其中刑法解释界限是讨论的焦点。在司法实践中,应明确刑法解释的界限是始于文义解释,终于刑法规范目的,要采取正确的逻辑顺序与适用方式:普通案件严格适用罪刑法定原则;疑难案件充分考量价值因素。Law is the product of a certain social and historical development, so the premise of accurate application of law needs to be explained. The methods of criminal law interpretation mainly include text interpretation, purpose interpretation and system interpretation. With the continuous development of criminal jurisprudence, the focus of the criminal law circle has gradually shifted to the hermeneutics of criminal law, in which the boundary of criminal law interpretation is the focus of discussion. In judicial practice, it should be clear that the boundary of criminal law interpretation starts from the textual interpretation and ends with the normative purpose of criminal law. The correct logical sequence and application mode should be adopted: the principle of legality of crime should be strictly applied to ordinary cases;Difficult cases fully consider the value factor.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170