检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学研究生院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 [2]黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院针灸一科,黑龙江 哈尔滨
出 处:《中医学》2024年第6期1332-1338,共7页Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨中医多种疗法治疗腓总神经损伤在临床中的应用。方法:查阅整理各种手段治疗腓总神经损伤的临床观察文献,从传统针刺方法如关刺、齐刺、电针结合其他疗法、到现代康复治疗、康复训练等方面举例论证。结果:针刺疗法和其他疗法相结合治疗腓总神经损伤的临床疗效较好。结论:针刺结合其他辅助治疗方法治疗腓总神经损伤的临床疗效较好,但关于其内在机制及相关的实验研究方面的探索相对较少,本文基于循证医学为研究依据,意在加强临床观察的细致性与实验研究的科学严谨性,以求更深层次的探索与发展其治疗机制,从而优化治疗方案,为患者提供更为精准和有效的治疗选择。Objective: To investigate the clinical application of multiple therapies in the treatment of common peroneal nerve injury in traditional Chinese medicine. Methods: The clinical observation literature on the treatment of common peroneal nerve injury by various methods was reviewed. From traditional acupuncture methods such as guan puncture, qi puncture, electroacupuncture combined with other therapies, to modern rehabilitation treatment, rehabilitation training and other aspects of the example. Results: The combination of acupuncture and other therapies had good clinical efficacy in the treatment of common peroneal nerve injury. Conclusion: Acupuncture combined with other adjuvant treatments has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of common peroneal nerve injury. However, there are relatively few explorations on its internal mechanism and related experimental studies. This paper is based on evidence-based medicine. It is intended to strengthen the meticulousness of clinical observation and the scientific rigor of experimental research, in order to explore and develop its therapeutic mechanism at a deeper level. This optimizes the treatment plan and provides patients with more precise and effective treatment options.
分 类 号:R24[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49