检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任焱
出 处:《水污染及处理》2023年第2期41-47,共7页Water Pollution and Treatment
摘 要:随着经济的繁荣发展,大量人口涌入城镇,导致城镇的污水排放量增加,水质严重恶化。在城镇化进程中,研究污水治理工艺有助于推广更加经济、高效的技术与方案,实现城镇的可持续发展。为此,本文将通过对AO与MBR两种一体化工艺处理城镇生活污水展开比较,主要从工艺特点、脱氮除磷效果、出水水质、工艺设备及后期运行费用入手,结合案例进行初步分析和讨论,希望通过对比两种工艺的优缺点及适用条件,对城镇生活污水处理体系的发展给予有效的建议。With the prosperity and development of the economy, a large number of people have poured into cities and towns, leading to an increase in the amount of sewage discharge in cities and towns, and a serious deterioration in water quality. In the process of urbanization, studying wastewater treat-ment processes can help promote more economical and efficient technologies and schemes, and achieve sustainable development of cities and towns. Therefore, this article will compare the two integrated processes of AO and MBR for the treatment of urban domestic sewage, mainly starting from the process characteristics, nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency, effluent quality, process equipment, and later operating costs. Based on a preliminary analysis and discussion of cases, it is hoped that by comparing the advantages, disadvantages, and applicable conditions of the two processes, effective suggestions will be given for the development of urban domestic sewage treatment systems.
关 键 词:城镇生活污水 可持续发展 污水排放量 污水治理 脱氮除磷 MBR 工艺设备 一体化工艺
分 类 号:X70[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49