检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任朝研
机构地区:[1]澳门科技大学法学院,澳门
出 处:《交叉科学快报》2024年第1期24-30,共7页Interdisciplinary Science Letters
摘 要:贝卡利亚作为近代资产阶级刑法的鼻祖,曾在《论犯罪与刑罚》中构建了立法权与解释权相融合、司法权与解释权相分离的刑法解释体系,并由此衍生出了极端的罪刑法定原则。这一体系在当时具有划时代的意义。但是,贝卡利亚过分否定法官的解释权,且忽略了学理解释对刑法活动的重要作用。笔者基于对贝卡利亚刑罚解释体系的启发,认为应当重视、提倡学理解释,对有权解释进行程序限制和内容审查,并建立对刑法解释内容合理性的客观标准,以完善我国的刑法解释体系。As the originator of bourgeois criminal law in modern times, Beccaria had constructed an interpre-tation system of criminal law in On Crime and Punishment, in which the legislative power and the explanatory power were combined, and the judicial power and the explanatory power were sepa-rated, and thus derived the extreme principle of legality of crime and punishment. This system had epoch-making significance at that time. However, Beccaria overnegates the judge’s power of inter-pretation and ignores the important role of theoretical interpretation in criminal law activities. Based on the inspiration of Beccaria’s penal interpretation system, the author thinks that we should attach importance to and advocate theoretical interpretation, restrict the procedure and review the content of the authorized interpretation, and establish the objective standard of the rationality of the content of the interpretation of criminal law, so as to perfect the system of the interpretation of criminal law in our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.254.100