论既判力主观范围的扩张——以股东代表诉讼为例  

On the Expansion of the Subjective Scope of Res Judicata —Taking Shareholder Representative Litigation as an Example

作　　者：蔡嘉仪 

机构地区：[1]南京审计大学法学院,江苏 南京

出　　处：《交叉科学快报》2024年第4期688-694,共7页Interdisciplinary Science Letters

摘　　要：本论文探讨了我国股东代表诉讼中判决既判力主观范围扩张的问题,结合我国《公司法》修订及相关司法解释,分析了股东代表诉讼判决既判力扩张的现状和存在的问题以及背后的原因,重点关注其对公司及其他股东权益保护的影响。通过对股东代表诉讼中原告股东诉讼实施权正当性来源的分析,明确了其与公司的法定诉讼担当关系。提出了在保障其他股东利益的视角下,合理限制股东代表诉讼判决既判力主观范围扩张的路径,以及其他的完善股东代表诉讼制的配套制度:包括完善诉讼告知与通知程序、引入不起诉理由书制度及压缩诉讼成本。This paper delves into the issue of the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation in China. By integrating the amendments to China’s “Company Law” and relevant judicial interpretations, it analyzes the current status, existing problems, and underlying causes of the expansion of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation, with a particular focus on its impact on the protection of company and other shareholders’ rights and interests. Through an examination of the legitimacy of the litigation exercise rights of plaintiff shareholders in shareholder representative litigation, the paper clarifies their legal relationship with the company as litigation trustees. From the perspective of safeguarding the interests of other shareholders, the paper proposes pathways to reasonably limit the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata in shareholder representative litigation and other supporting measures to improve the shareholder representative litigation system, including refining the litigation notification procedures, introducing a system of reasons for not initiating a lawsuit, and reducing litigation costs.

关 键 词：股东代表诉讼制度 既判力 股东利益 法定诉讼担当 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]