检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段欣瑶
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学国际法学院,上海
出 处:《交叉科学快报》2025年第2期116-124,共9页Interdisciplinary Science Letters
摘 要:本文旨在分析美国《通胀削减法案》中的电动汽车补贴条款及其可能违反的WTO规则。通过对该法案中涉及的税收抵免政策、关键矿物质和电池部件要求进行详细分析,本文探讨了其如何通过本地化要求影响国际贸易,并提出该政策可能违反WTO的最惠国待遇和国民待遇原则。尤其是针对中国和其他非自由贸易区成员,本文分析了该法案可能带来的贸易壁垒,并结合相关案例如“美国可再生能源案”对比,揭示了类似措施在WTO争端解决中的潜在法律风险。最终,本文指出,在全球经济一体化的背景下,美国这一政策不仅可能引发国际争议,也凸显了在全球绿色转型过程中,如何平衡国内产业保护与国际贸易自由的挑战。This paper aims to analyze the electric vehicle subsidy provisions in the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act and their potential violations of WTO rules. Through a detailed examination of the tax credit policies, key mineral and battery component requirements, this paper explores how the localization demands in the Act affect international trade and suggests that the policy may violate the WTO’ Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) and National Treatment principles. In particular, the paper analyzes the trade barriers the Act might create for China and other non-free trade area members, drawing comparisons to the “U.S. Renewable Energy Case” to reveal the potential legal risks of similar measures in WTO dispute resolution. Ultimately, this paper points out that in the context of global economic integration, this U.S. policy could not only trigger international disputes but also highlights the challenges of balancing domestic industry protection with international trade freedom in the process of global green transition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62