Road User Charging for Urban Freight Vehicles: A Systems Approach  

作　　者：Loshaka Perera Russell G. Thompson Loshaka Perera;Russell G. Thompson(Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)

机构地区：[1]Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

出　　处：《Journal of Transportation Technologies》2020年第3期214-243,共30页交通科技期刊（英文）

摘　　要：Road user charging (RUC) has a long history as a mechanism to recover<span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> infrastructure maintenance and capital costs. The present RUC systems are facing issues such as transparency, cross-subsidization, environmental concerns and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">reducing revenue due to the likes of lessening fuel tax as vehicles become more </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">efficient. Therefore, this paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the present RUC mechanisms implemented in the world with respect to stakeholder problems and demands of the freight industry and to describe the need</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for a more appropriate, practical and sustainable approach that can be used in the future. Finally, a model is proposed that is transparent and considers us</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">age-based charging addressing most of the weaknesses highlighted in the models reviewed. Further, it considers externalities produced by heavy vehicles into a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ccount. The model has the potential to provide answers to key stakeholder </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">issues and will lead to a sustainable freight transport system in the future. Encourag</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing fuel-efficient modes, optimization of loading, routing and logistics systems, and long term land use planning are a few of them.</span></span>Road user charging (RUC) has a long history as a mechanism to recover<span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> infrastructure maintenance and capital costs. The present RUC systems are facing issues such as transparency, cross-subsidization, environmental concerns and </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">reducing revenue due to the likes of lessening fuel tax as vehicles become more </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">efficient. Therefore, this paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the present RUC mechanisms implemented in the world with respect to stakeholder problems and demands of the freight industry and to describe the need</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for a more appropriate, practical and sustainable approach that can be used in the future. Finally, a model is proposed that is transparent and considers us</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">age-based charging addressing most of the weaknesses highlighted in the models reviewed. Further, it considers externalities produced by heavy vehicles into a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ccount. The model has the potential to provide answers to key stakeholder </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">issues and will lead to a sustainable freight transport system in the future. Encourag</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing fuel-efficient modes, optimization of loading, routing and logistics systems, and long term land use planning are a few of them.</span></span>

关 键 词：Road User Charge Heavy Vehicles Externalities City Logistics Systems Approach 

分 类 号：F42[经济管理—产业经济]