Contrastive Analysis of Distractions to Pilot Caused by Various Flight Instrument Displays  

作　　者：Devinder Kumar Yadav Yingxue Zhao Chunyi Gao Yufei Wang Tianzuo Dong Dinesh Bhatia Devinder Kumar Yadav;Yingxue Zhao;Chunyi Gao;Yufei Wang;Tianzuo Dong;Dinesh Bhatia(University of Nottingham Ningbo, Ningbo, China;University of Glasgow, Singapore, Singapore)

机构地区：[1]University of Nottingham Ningbo, Ningbo, China [2]University of Glasgow, Singapore, Singapore

出　　处：《Journal of Transportation Technologies》2022年第2期209-227,共19页交通科技期刊（英文）

摘　　要：Automation of aircraft instrument displays enhances flight safety, but it also increases complexity and pilot workload. Executing changes in flight plan, navigation or communication during flight using flight instrument switches often increases pilots’ workload and this may also cause distraction that adds potential risks to flight safety. This study compares the conventional avionics panel and touchscreen avionic panel to find out the least distractive panel for the pilots. Thirty simulated flights using four different pilots were carried out;and aircraft speed, altitude and heading parameters using both avionics systems were observed to study the operational efficiency and pilot distraction resulted from each of the avionic systems. The distraction was examined by a parameter analysis based on the Mean Squared Error (MSE) mathematical model and visually by recording videos of each simulated flight. The results indicate that the touchscreen system is more efficient and less erroneous for the aircraft in maintaining the parameters as compared with the conventional system. There is also a clear relationship between task completion time and disruption level on the parameters control.Automation of aircraft instrument displays enhances flight safety, but it also increases complexity and pilot workload. Executing changes in flight plan, navigation or communication during flight using flight instrument switches often increases pilots’ workload and this may also cause distraction that adds potential risks to flight safety. This study compares the conventional avionics panel and touchscreen avionic panel to find out the least distractive panel for the pilots. Thirty simulated flights using four different pilots were carried out;and aircraft speed, altitude and heading parameters using both avionics systems were observed to study the operational efficiency and pilot distraction resulted from each of the avionic systems. The distraction was examined by a parameter analysis based on the Mean Squared Error (MSE) mathematical model and visually by recording videos of each simulated flight. The results indicate that the touchscreen system is more efficient and less erroneous for the aircraft in maintaining the parameters as compared with the conventional system. There is also a clear relationship between task completion time and disruption level on the parameters control.

关 键 词：Aviation Touchscreen Safety Conventional COCKPIT Simulate FLIGHT 

分 类 号：V24[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]