A Comparative Study between Landmark Based and Real Time Ultrasound Guided Sub Arachnoid Block  

作　　者：Kunal Tewari Om Bahadur Thapa Deepak Mishra Manjot Multani Jyotsna Sharma Akash Ray Mohapatra Sandhya Khwaunju Kunal Tewari;Om Bahadur Thapa;Deepak Mishra;Manjot Multani;Jyotsna Sharma;Akash Ray Mohapatra;Sandhya Khwaunju(Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India;Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AFMC, Pune, India)

机构地区：[1]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India [2]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, AFMC, Pune, India

出　　处：《Open Journal of Anesthesiology》2024年第4期118-125,共8页麻醉学期刊（英文）

摘　　要：Background: Sub arachnoid block (SAB) performed by traditional landmark palpation technique can be inaccurate. This problem is exacerbated by altered patient anatomy due to obesity and age-related changes. A pre-procedural ultrasound scan of the lumbar spine has been shown to be of benefit in guiding lumbar epidural insertion in obstetric patients. Information on the use of real-time ultrasound (RUS) guided SAB, to date, been limited. This study compared RUS guided SAB to traditional landmark guided technique in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for different surgical procedures. Methods: This was a prospective, single center, comparative observational study conducted in the department of anesthesiology at our center. 560 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia either by landmark based technique or real-time ultrasound-guided methods. The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate of dural puncture when employing the two methods. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two study groups. The first attempt success rate of dural puncture in landmark guided group was 64.3% compared to 72.6% in the ultrasound guided group. This difference was not statistically significant. The procedure performance time was significantly shorter with landmark palpation compared to use of real-time ultrasound guided method. Conclusion: Use of RUS-guided technique does not significantly improve the first attempt success rate of SAB dural puncture during spinal anesthesia compared to the traditional landmark-guided technique.Background: Sub arachnoid block (SAB) performed by traditional landmark palpation technique can be inaccurate. This problem is exacerbated by altered patient anatomy due to obesity and age-related changes. A pre-procedural ultrasound scan of the lumbar spine has been shown to be of benefit in guiding lumbar epidural insertion in obstetric patients. Information on the use of real-time ultrasound (RUS) guided SAB, to date, been limited. This study compared RUS guided SAB to traditional landmark guided technique in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for different surgical procedures. Methods: This was a prospective, single center, comparative observational study conducted in the department of anesthesiology at our center. 560 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia either by landmark based technique or real-time ultrasound-guided methods. The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate of dural puncture when employing the two methods. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in the two study groups. The first attempt success rate of dural puncture in landmark guided group was 64.3% compared to 72.6% in the ultrasound guided group. This difference was not statistically significant. The procedure performance time was significantly shorter with landmark palpation compared to use of real-time ultrasound guided method. Conclusion: Use of RUS-guided technique does not significantly improve the first attempt success rate of SAB dural puncture during spinal anesthesia compared to the traditional landmark-guided technique.

关 键 词：Sub Arachnoid Block (SAB) Real Time Ultrasound (RUS) 

分 类 号：R61[医药卫生—外科学]