A Study of Plaque Adhesion during Implant Treatment of Missing Molars  

作　　者：Yuka Hasegawa Yu Kishimoto Yasunori Kanemitsu Toshiichiro Tanabe Kuniteru Nagahara Tetsuji Nakamoto Yuka Hasegawa;Yu Kishimoto;Yasunori Kanemitsu;Toshiichiro Tanabe;Kuniteru Nagahara;Tetsuji Nakamoto(Department of Maxillofacial Implant, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, Mizuho, Japan;Medical and Dental Center, Asahi University, Mizuho, Japan)

机构地区：[1]Department of Maxillofacial Implant, School of Dentistry, Asahi University, Mizuho, Japan [2]Medical and Dental Center, Asahi University, Mizuho, Japan

出　　处：《Open Journal of Stomatology》2022年第3期96-102,共7页口腔学期刊（英文）

摘　　要：Purpose: In implant treatment, the abutments and superstructures form a transmucosal area. In addition to providing appropriate cleaning instructions to patients, its material properties must be carefully considered. It is not clear how much plaque adhesion occurs at each site during treatment process, and the effect of materials on plaque adhesion. Methods: In this study, 33 patients, 13 maxillary cases and 20 mandibular cases, who had implants placed in the missing molars were evaluated for the plaque adhesion of provisional restorations made of acrylic resin and monolithic zirconia final restoration after a period of more than 4 weeks. In addition, oral hygiene instructions were thoroughly given for 12 cases at the time of staining after the provisional restorations, and re-evaluated in 4 weeks. Results: About 20% of the buccal-lingual area of the prosthetic device fabricated with acrylic resin showed plaque staining, whereas about 40% of the area of the mesial and distal. On the other hand, for the zirconia final restorations, the percentage of staining was about 5% for buccal and lingual surface and 10% for mesial and distal surface. The stained area ratio of the provisional restoration correlated with the zirconia superstructure area ratio. Even with careful oral hygiene, it became clear that the amount of plaque adhesion due to the difference in materials could not be overcome. Conclusion: The zirconia superstructure is extremely good from the viewpoint of plaque adhesion, but cases with a large stained area at the time of provisional restoration should be carefully followed up.Purpose: In implant treatment, the abutments and superstructures form a transmucosal area. In addition to providing appropriate cleaning instructions to patients, its material properties must be carefully considered. It is not clear how much plaque adhesion occurs at each site during treatment process, and the effect of materials on plaque adhesion. Methods: In this study, 33 patients, 13 maxillary cases and 20 mandibular cases, who had implants placed in the missing molars were evaluated for the plaque adhesion of provisional restorations made of acrylic resin and monolithic zirconia final restoration after a period of more than 4 weeks. In addition, oral hygiene instructions were thoroughly given for 12 cases at the time of staining after the provisional restorations, and re-evaluated in 4 weeks. Results: About 20% of the buccal-lingual area of the prosthetic device fabricated with acrylic resin showed plaque staining, whereas about 40% of the area of the mesial and distal. On the other hand, for the zirconia final restorations, the percentage of staining was about 5% for buccal and lingual surface and 10% for mesial and distal surface. The stained area ratio of the provisional restoration correlated with the zirconia superstructure area ratio. Even with careful oral hygiene, it became clear that the amount of plaque adhesion due to the difference in materials could not be overcome. Conclusion: The zirconia superstructure is extremely good from the viewpoint of plaque adhesion, but cases with a large stained area at the time of provisional restoration should be carefully followed up.

关 键 词：SUPERSTRUCTURE Dental Plaque Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Polymethyl Methacrylate 

分 类 号：O61[理学—无机化学]