An Energy Formula That Is Physically Easier to Understand than E = hν  

作　　者：Koshun Suto Koshun Suto(Chudai-Ji Temple, Isesaki, Japan)

机构地区：[1]Chudai-Ji Temple, Isesaki, Japan

出　　处：《Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics》2023年第12期3909-3913,共5页应用数学与应用物理(英文)

摘　　要：This paper rewrites the famous energy formula of quantum theory, E = hν, as a formula that is physically easier to understand. If we let m_e be the rest mass of the electron, c the speed of light in a vacuum, and λ_c the Compton wavelength of the electron, then the product of the three physical constants, m_ecλ_c, matches the value of the Planck constant. In the usual interpretation, h is regarded as a universal constant on a par with c. However, this paper holds that, contrary to the historical viewpoint, the Planck constant is logically nothing more than replacement of me</sub>cλ_c with the alphabetic letter h. Thus, this paper looks for an energy formula that does not contain h. E = hν is a formula that was assumed at the beginning, and then subsequently verified through experiment. The formula was not derived logically. In contrast, the energy formula derived in this paper can be derived logically. The formula derived in this paper also has a clear physical meaning, and it can be concluded that it is a superior formula to E = hν.This paper rewrites the famous energy formula of quantum theory, E = hν, as a formula that is physically easier to understand. If we let m_e be the rest mass of the electron, c the speed of light in a vacuum, and λ_c the Compton wavelength of the electron, then the product of the three physical constants, m_ecλ_c, matches the value of the Planck constant. In the usual interpretation, h is regarded as a universal constant on a par with c. However, this paper holds that, contrary to the historical viewpoint, the Planck constant is logically nothing more than replacement of me</sub>cλ_c with the alphabetic letter h. Thus, this paper looks for an energy formula that does not contain h. E = hν is a formula that was assumed at the beginning, and then subsequently verified through experiment. The formula was not derived logically. In contrast, the energy formula derived in this paper can be derived logically. The formula derived in this paper also has a clear physical meaning, and it can be concluded that it is a superior formula to E = hν.

关 键 词：Einstein-de Broglie’s Relation Planck Constant Electron’s Compton Wavelength Classical Quantum Theory 

分 类 号：O17[理学—数学]