机构地区:[1]Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Rome, Italy
出 处:《Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications》2024年第8期115-139,共25页电磁分析与应用期刊(英文)
摘 要:This work identifies the branch point, which was never explicit in EM treatises, from which came the choice of abandoning the Galilean transformations in favor of the Lorentz covariance, a path that originated the various relativistic theories. The need arising from the expanding Earth for a hydrodynamic mechanism for Newtonian and Coulomb fields is discussed. This hydrodynamic material mechanism is shown to constitute a completion of the Newton and Maxwell concepts of the fields, which were only a phenomenological description of physical reality. It is shown that the analogy between Maxwell’s equations and hydrodynamics cannot become a perfect correspondence. The lack of coupling of the electromagnetic field to the underlying material “causing field”—which induces hydrodynamical forces and accelerations observed only phenomenologically—gives rise to inaccuracies in the formulation of its equations, which are incorrect for Galilean covariance. But the most serious flaw in the original formulation of electromagnetism is the erroneous identification of the flow velocity of the field (variable as 1/r2) with the speed of light c, with which it was demonstrated that the fields of charges in motion contract in the direction of motion (the Heaviside ellipsoid, 1888, 1889). From this error, historically due to the incomplete development of many hydrodynamics sectors (a situation that persists today), came Fitz Gerald’s contractions and finally, the relativistic theories. Some future research lines are proposed for a return to realistic physics and a possible but still weak form of Galilean covariance.This work identifies the branch point, which was never explicit in EM treatises, from which came the choice of abandoning the Galilean transformations in favor of the Lorentz covariance, a path that originated the various relativistic theories. The need arising from the expanding Earth for a hydrodynamic mechanism for Newtonian and Coulomb fields is discussed. This hydrodynamic material mechanism is shown to constitute a completion of the Newton and Maxwell concepts of the fields, which were only a phenomenological description of physical reality. It is shown that the analogy between Maxwell’s equations and hydrodynamics cannot become a perfect correspondence. The lack of coupling of the electromagnetic field to the underlying material “causing field”—which induces hydrodynamical forces and accelerations observed only phenomenologically—gives rise to inaccuracies in the formulation of its equations, which are incorrect for Galilean covariance. But the most serious flaw in the original formulation of electromagnetism is the erroneous identification of the flow velocity of the field (variable as 1/r2) with the speed of light c, with which it was demonstrated that the fields of charges in motion contract in the direction of motion (the Heaviside ellipsoid, 1888, 1889). From this error, historically due to the incomplete development of many hydrodynamics sectors (a situation that persists today), came Fitz Gerald’s contractions and finally, the relativistic theories. Some future research lines are proposed for a return to realistic physics and a possible but still weak form of Galilean covariance.
关 键 词:Expanding Earth Aether Central Flow Hydrodynamic Gravity Material Fields ELECTRODYNAMICS Galilean Covariance
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...