Monitoring Re-Suspension and Transport of Dioxin Contaminated Sediment to Evaluate the Recovery of a Shallow Urban Creek Post Sediment Remediation  

作　　者：Lisa Richman Liad Haimovici Terry Kolic Sladjana Besevic Eric Reiner Lisa Richman;Liad Haimovici;Terry Kolic;Sladjana Besevic;Eric Reiner(Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Etobicoke, Canada)

机构地区：[1]Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Etobicoke, Canada

出　　处：《Journal of Environmental Protection》2016年第3期453-466,共14页环境保护（英文）

摘　　要：Pringle Creek, identified as the source of dioxin/furan (PCDD/F) contamination to a Lake Ontario harbour was remediated in 2008. Surface sediment collected in 2013 near the floodplain remediation was no longer contaminated (∑₁₇PCDD\Fs < 60 pg/g dw), but residual contamination extended downstream to the creek mouth (surface sediment maximum: ∑₁₇PCDD\Fs 2900 pg/g dw). Nevertheless, sediment ∑₁₇PCDD/F concentrations were lower in 2013 than pre-remediation suggesting that cleaner sediment was being deposited in the creek. Core data confirmed the decrease in sediment contamination through time since the most contaminated sediment was buried. Prior to the development of a remediation strategy for the harbour, the transport of bed-load and suspended sediment contaminated with PCDD/F was assessed. The challenge was the shallow water depth (0.6 m) throughout the creek thereby requiring non-standard sediment traps designed for this study. Suspended sediment collected in traps in 2014 showed residual contamination at the remediated site (∑₁₇PCDD\Fs: 380 pg/g dw;TEQ (TEF fish) < 0.6 pg/g), with concentrations increasing with distance downstream mirroring surface sediment: mean ∑17PCDD\Fs concentration for suspended sediment at the creek mouth was 2200 pg/g (SD 260 pg/g dw) indicating PCDD/F contributions to the harbour. However, congener patterns in bottom sediment and suspended sediment near the remediated site and extending about 100 m downstream were similar to background upstream patterns consistent with atmospheric deposition as the source rather than the historical source which indicated that floodplain remedial actions were successful.Pringle Creek, identified as the source of dioxin/furan (PCDD/F) contamination to a Lake Ontario harbour was remediated in 2008. Surface sediment collected in 2013 near the floodplain remediation was no longer contaminated (∑₁₇PCDD\Fs < 60 pg/g dw), but residual contamination extended downstream to the creek mouth (surface sediment maximum: ∑₁₇PCDD\Fs 2900 pg/g dw). Nevertheless, sediment ∑₁₇PCDD/F concentrations were lower in 2013 than pre-remediation suggesting that cleaner sediment was being deposited in the creek. Core data confirmed the decrease in sediment contamination through time since the most contaminated sediment was buried. Prior to the development of a remediation strategy for the harbour, the transport of bed-load and suspended sediment contaminated with PCDD/F was assessed. The challenge was the shallow water depth (0.6 m) throughout the creek thereby requiring non-standard sediment traps designed for this study. Suspended sediment collected in traps in 2014 showed residual contamination at the remediated site (∑₁₇PCDD\Fs: 380 pg/g dw;TEQ (TEF fish) < 0.6 pg/g), with concentrations increasing with distance downstream mirroring surface sediment: mean ∑17PCDD\Fs concentration for suspended sediment at the creek mouth was 2200 pg/g (SD 260 pg/g dw) indicating PCDD/F contributions to the harbour. However, congener patterns in bottom sediment and suspended sediment near the remediated site and extending about 100 m downstream were similar to background upstream patterns consistent with atmospheric deposition as the source rather than the historical source which indicated that floodplain remedial actions were successful.

关 键 词：DIOXINS FURANS Sediment REMEDIATION Contamination 

分 类 号：TV1[水利工程]