检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Harshvardhan Aditya Siddansh Chawla Gunika Dhingra Parijat Rai Saumil Sood Tanmay Singh Zeba Mohsin Wase Arshdeep Bahga Vijay K. Madisetti Harshvardhan Aditya;Siddansh Chawla;Gunika Dhingra;Parijat Rai;Saumil Sood;Tanmay Singh;Zeba Mohsin Wase;Arshdeep Bahga;Vijay K. Madisetti(School of Computer Science Engineering & Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India;Cloudemy Technology Labs, Chandigarh, India;School of Cybersecurity and Privacy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA)
机构地区:[1]School of Computer Science Engineering & Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India [2]Cloudemy Technology Labs, Chandigarh, India [3]School of Cybersecurity and Privacy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
出 处:《Journal of Software Engineering and Applications》2024年第5期421-447,共27页软件工程与应用(英文)
摘 要:The recent interest in the deployment of Generative AI applications that use large language models (LLMs) has brought to the forefront significant privacy concerns, notably the leakage of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and other confidential or protected information that may have been memorized during training, specifically during a fine-tuning or customization process. We describe different black-box attacks from potential adversaries and study their impact on the amount and type of information that may be recovered from commonly used and deployed LLMs. Our research investigates the relationship between PII leakage, memorization, and factors such as model size, architecture, and the nature of attacks employed. The study utilizes two broad categories of attacks: PII leakage-focused attacks (auto-completion and extraction attacks) and memorization-focused attacks (various membership inference attacks). The findings from these investigations are quantified using an array of evaluative metrics, providing a detailed understanding of LLM vulnerabilities and the effectiveness of different attacks.The recent interest in the deployment of Generative AI applications that use large language models (LLMs) has brought to the forefront significant privacy concerns, notably the leakage of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and other confidential or protected information that may have been memorized during training, specifically during a fine-tuning or customization process. We describe different black-box attacks from potential adversaries and study their impact on the amount and type of information that may be recovered from commonly used and deployed LLMs. Our research investigates the relationship between PII leakage, memorization, and factors such as model size, architecture, and the nature of attacks employed. The study utilizes two broad categories of attacks: PII leakage-focused attacks (auto-completion and extraction attacks) and memorization-focused attacks (various membership inference attacks). The findings from these investigations are quantified using an array of evaluative metrics, providing a detailed understanding of LLM vulnerabilities and the effectiveness of different attacks.
关 键 词:Large Language Models PII Leakage Privacy Memorization OVERFITTING Membership Inference Attack (MIA)
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.37.16