检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Yujiao Yan Jing Wu Juan Liu Yanting Yuan Lixin Liu Huaxin Ye Juan Ding Yujiao Yan;Jing Wu;Juan Liu;Yanting Yuan;Lixin Liu;Huaxin Ye;Juan Ding(Nursing Department of Hubei Aerospace Hospital, Xiaogan, China;School of Stomatology, Hubei Vocational and Technical College, Xiaogan, China;Department of Medicine, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China)
机构地区:[1]Nursing Department of Hubei Aerospace Hospital, Xiaogan, China [2]School of Stomatology, Hubei Vocational and Technical College, Xiaogan, China [3]Department of Medicine, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
出 处:《Yangtze Medicine》2024年第1期8-19,共12页长江医药(英文)
摘 要:Objective: To explore the effect of evidence-based quality control circle (QCC) in improving the implementation rate of airway management measures in adult critically ill patients. Methods: Based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based health care model, the best evidence of airway management in adult critically ill patients was obtained and applied to the clinic. Results: The total implementation rate of airway management measures in adult critically ill patients increased from 23.62% before the implementation of quality control circle to 88.82%, and the pulmonary infection rate in critically ill patients decreased from 42.31% to 21.74%, with statistical significance between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion: Evidence-based quality control circle activities can standardize the practice standards of airway management in critically ill patients, reduce the occurrence of patients’ airway related complications, and improve clinical outcomes.Objective: To explore the effect of evidence-based quality control circle (QCC) in improving the implementation rate of airway management measures in adult critically ill patients. Methods: Based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) evidence-based health care model, the best evidence of airway management in adult critically ill patients was obtained and applied to the clinic. Results: The total implementation rate of airway management measures in adult critically ill patients increased from 23.62% before the implementation of quality control circle to 88.82%, and the pulmonary infection rate in critically ill patients decreased from 42.31% to 21.74%, with statistical significance between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion: Evidence-based quality control circle activities can standardize the practice standards of airway management in critically ill patients, reduce the occurrence of patients’ airway related complications, and improve clinical outcomes.
关 键 词:Critically Ill Patients Airway Management Be Evidence-Based Quality Control Circle Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229