康德崇高论在自然审美中的重构——以埃米莉·布雷迪的环境美学论证为中心  

The Reconstruction of Kant’s Sublime in the Aesthetics of Nature——Emily Brady’s Argument for Environmental Aesthetics as an Example

作　　者：刘漫 Liu Man(School of Philosophy,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学哲学学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期66-71,128,共7页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“马堡学派的哲学思想及其现当代哲学意义研究”(项目编号:17CZX041);2018年度郑州大学礼仪学校教学研究专项课题“美育思想在大学生礼仪教育教学中的运用”;2017年河南省意识形态与社会治理优势特色学科、郑州大学意识形态安全研究中心招标课题“审美意识形态与美育相关问题研究”(项目编号:YSXT-2017-028)

摘　　要：埃米莉·布雷迪通过对康德崇高论的重构来进行环境美学的探讨,是传统哲学在当代哲学美学中再生的经典范例。布雷迪将康德崇高论中对“自我关涉”的强调倒转为对“关涉他者”的强调,确立了崇高审美以自然为客体,建立起审美主体与自然客体之间的关系,这种关系既具有审美价值又具有伦理价值。布雷迪对康德崇高论的重构基于传统而面向当下,既恢复了康德崇高论在当代美学中的理论价值,又与环境保护的时代要求相应和,体现出英美实用主义的倾向。Emily Brady’s exploration of environmental aesthetics through a reconstruction of the Kantian sublime is a classic example of the renewal of traditional traditional philosophy in contemporary philosophical aesthetics.Brady reverses the emphasis on"self-regarding"in the Kantian sublime to an emphasis on"other-regarding",establishing the sublime aesthetic with nature as its object and establishing a relationship between the aesthetic subject and the natural object that has both aesthetic and ethical value.Brady’s reconstruction of the Kantian sublime is based on tradition and oriented to the present,which not only restores the theoretical value of the Kantian sublime in contemporary aesthetics,but also corresponds to the requirements of the times for environmental protection,reflecting the tendency of Anglo-American pragmatism.

关 键 词：崇高 自然审美 环境美学 

分 类 号：B834.2[哲学宗教—美学]