创新工作行为与跨政府建立关系网络  

Innovative work behaviors and networking across government

作　　者：穆罕默德·阿基夫·德米西奥卢 塔哈·哈梅杜丁 科林·诺克斯 王秋蕾(译) 熊缨(审校) Mehmet Akif Demircioglu;Taha Hameduddin;Colin Knox;Qiulei Wang(National University of Singapore,Singapore;Nazarbayev University,Kazakhstan;不详)

机构地区：[1]新加坡国立大学李光耀公共政策学院 [2]哈萨克斯坦纳扎尔巴耶夫大学公共政策研究生院 [3]中国人事科学研究院 [4]不详

出　　处：《国际行政科学评论（中文版）》2023年第1期160-182,共23页International Review of Administrative Sciences

基　　金：新加坡国立大学的支持(一级教育部拨款R-603-000-344-133和R-603-000-270-133)

摘　　要：长期以来,公共组织一直面临着变得更具创新性和协作性的压力。与此同时,在学术和实践方面,也伴随着从传统官僚结构向建立更多关系网络的公共行政转变的趋势。我们以澳大利亚公共服务部门为例,以其对增加关系网络建设的重视程度,来检验增加关系网络联系行为是否与更具创新性的工作行为相关。在开发理论模型时,我们假设建立关系网络活动与创新工作行为正相关,但建立关系网络的行为太少或太多与创新工作行为负相关。分析发现,建立关系网络的实践确实与更高水平的创新工作行为相关,但它们在公共管理者接触的不同利益相关者类型之间有所差异。此外,我们只找到了这两种结构之间曲线关系的有限证据。本文最后给出了对研究和实践的启示。Public organizations have long faced pressures to become more innovative and entrepreneurial.This has been accompanied by a shift from traditional bureaucratic structures toward public management networks,both in scholarship and practice.We use the example of the Australian public service and its emphasis on increased networking to examine whether increased networking behavior is associated with greater innovative work behaviors.In developing our theoretical model,we hypothesize that networking activities are positively related to innovative work behaviors but that too few or too many networked actors are negatively associated with innovative work behaviors.Our analysis finds that networking practices are,indeed,associated with greater levels of innovative work behaviors but that they differ between the type of stakeholders public managers engage with.In addition,we fnd only limited evidence of a curillinear relationship between these two constructs.The article ends with implications for research and practice.

关 键 词：协作 创新工作行为 建立关系网络 公共组织 公共部门创新 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]