中间裁决制度的体系展开  

Unfolding the System of Interim Award

作　　者：苟应鹏 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《商事仲裁与调解》2022年第2期97-112,共16页Commercial Arbitration & Mediation

摘　　要：将中间裁决等同于部分裁决、临时裁决,或是将中间裁决限于程序问题的认识既背离了仲裁制度的基本原理,也与我国对仲裁裁决的固有认识相抵牾。产生这种误识的根源在于国际上对中间裁决、部分裁决与临时裁决的不同界定。对中间裁决的澄清需要回归我国制度环境,并借助与其原理相称的中间判决理论进行体系阐释。中间裁决实际是针对实体性先决事项的仲裁裁决,虽然该裁决对于整个仲裁程序而言是中间性的,但对已经决定了的事项却是最终性的。当事人、仲裁庭皆应受其拘束,当事人不服的,可以直接向法院申请撤销而不用等到仲裁程序结束时。The understanding that the interim award is equivalent to partial award,provisional award,or the interim award is limited to procedural issues not only deviates from the basic principles of the arbitration system,but also contradicts the inherent understanding of the arbitration award in our country.The root of this misunderstanding is that the existing understanding is submerged in the different definitions of interim award,partial award and provisional award in the world.The clarification of interim award needs to return to China’s institutional environment,and to make a systematic interpretation with the help of interim judgment commensurate with its principle.In fact,an interim award is an arbitration award for substantive preconditions.Although the award is intermediate for the whole arbitration procedure,it is final for the things that have been decided.The parties and the arbitration tribunal shall be bound by them.If the parties are not satisfied,they may directly apply to the court for cancellation without waiting until the end of the arbitration proceedings.

关 键 词：中间裁决 部分裁决 中间判决 先决问题 部分仲裁请求 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]