使用盗窃行为之可罚性研究  

Research on the Punishability of Theft for the Purpose of Temporary Use

作　　者：范淼[1] 任海月 Fan Miao;Ren Haiyue

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院

出　　处：《盛京法律评论》2023年第1期63-81,共19页Shengjing Law Review

摘　　要：使用盗窃行为,即盗取他人财物使用,用后归还的行为。我国目前仅有两个司法解释提到过偷开机动车的规制问题,此现状不能实现对严重侵害法益的使用盗窃行为的有效规制目的。学界大多围绕使用盗窃行为是否应当以盗窃罪定罪处罚展开讨论,并形成主观说和客观说两类观点。基于动产的可移动性特征,可罚的使用盗窃行为对象应当被限定于动产使用权。使用盗窃可罚性的判断基准应当遵循先客观后主观的顺序,首先在客观上判断使用盗窃行为是否给权利人的利用造成了严重妨害,其次在主观上考量行为人的排除意思和利用意思。可罚的使用盗窃犯罪数额认定应当具体审查被害人的经济损失,而行为人所获经济利益仅为损失认定的参考辅助。Theft for the purpose of temporary use,that is,the act of stealing other people's property for use and returning it after use.At present,only two judicial interpretations in China mention the regulation problem of driving motor vehicles without permission,which can not effectively regulate the theft for the purpose of temporary use that seriously infringes on legal interest.The academic circles mostly discuss whether the theft for the purpose of temporary use should be punished as larceny and form subjective and objective views.Based on movable property of chattel,the object of punishable theft for the purpose of temporary use should be limited to the right to use chattel.The judgment criterion of the.punishability of the theft for the purpose of temporary use should follow the order from objective to subjective.Firstly,it objectively judges whether the theft for the purpose of temporary use has caused serious harm to the right holder's utilization,and then subjectively considers the perpetrator's intention of exclusion and use.The economic loss of the victim should be specifically examined in the determination of the amount of the crime of punishable theft for the purpose of temporary use,while the economic benefit obtained by the perpetrator is only a reference for the determination of the loss.

关 键 词：使用盗窃 盗窃罪 相当的利用妨害 排除意思和利用意思 犯罪数额 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]