解构之为辩护:理论和历史中的作者责任  

Deconstruction as Defense:Authorial Responsibilityin Theoryand History

作　　者：郑楠[1] Zheng Nan

机构地区：[1]安徽大学文学院

出　　处：《思想与文化》2023年第1期187-198,共12页Thought & Culture

摘　　要：回顾二十世纪风靡一时的解构主义运动,从德里达(Jacques Derrida)的哲学筹划,到德曼(Paul de Man)的解构文论,再到“德曼事件”的爆发及事后德里达为德曼所作的辩护,理论与历史的走向发生了逆转:一度沉寂的“伦理主体”问题被重新提出,传统作者中心主义批评和反作者中心论互换阵营再度交锋,作者在宣告死亡的瞬间归来。Looking back at the popular deconstructionist movement of the last century,from Jacques Derrida's philosophical planning to Paul de Man's theory of deconstruction,to the outbreak of the“De Man Event”and Derrida's post-Derrida defense of De Man,the theoretical and historical direction has been reversed:the oncesilent issue of the“ethical subject”has been reintroduced,traditional author-centered criticism and anti-author-centered theory exchanged sides,and the author has returned in the moment of death.

关 键 词：解构批评 保罗·德曼 伦理主体 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]