经学、哲学之辩与海派中国哲学——2017—2018年上海中国哲学学科发展评议  

Confucian Classics vs Philosophy and Shanghai School of Chinese Philosophy:Review on the Development of Shanghai Chinese Philosophy between 2017 and 2018

作　　者：苟东锋 Gou Dongfeng

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所 [2]华东师范大学哲学系

出　　处：《思想与文化》2019年第1期396-412,共17页Thought & Culture

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“以‘名’为考察背景的儒家知识论研究”(17BZX124);江苏省“公民道德与社会风尚”协同创新中心、“道德发展智库”资助.

摘　　要：近年来,上海中国哲学界呈现出一种清晰的脉络化趋势。从2017—2018年的情况看,一种多维研究的态势已然出现,其中又以经学和哲学之辩最为突出。实际上,上海中国哲学界的这种情况是对本世纪初以来中国哲学"合法性"危机的一种回应。有意思的是,这场持续十多年的中国哲学"合法性"的讨论就肇始于上海,源于王元化与法国哲学家德里达之间的一场国际辩论。考察上海中国哲学界的发展,一种包涵了开放和多元等因素的"海派中国哲学"的概念开始浮现。In recent years,there has been a clear venation trend in Chinese philosophy circles in Shanghai.From the situation of 2017-2018,a multi-dimensional research trend has emerged,which is highlighted by the debate on classics and philosophy.In fact,this situation in Chinese philosophy circles in Shanghai is a response to the crisis of"legitimacy"of Chinese philosophy since the beginning of this century.Interestingly,the debate over the"legitimacy"of Chinese philosophy,which has been going on for more than a decade,began in Shanghai with an international debate between Wang Yuanhua and the French philosopher Derrida.The study of the development of Chinese philosophy in Shanghai reveals the emergence of the concept of "Shanghai School of Chinese philosophy",which includes such factors as openness and pluralism.

关 键 词：经学 哲学 多维视角 海派中国哲学 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]