检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:辛继湘[1] 杨志平 Xin Jixiang;Yang Zhiping(College of Education Science,Hunan Normal University,Changcha 410081)
出 处:《教育发展研究》2020年第4期5-10,共6页Research in Educational Development
基 金:国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“文化自信导向的中小学课程创新研究”(BHA180159)的部分成果.
摘 要:埃吕尔认为作为效率、环境与系统而存在的技术并非单纯为人所控制,而是具有鲜明的自主性。居于技术世界,人在技术意识的裹挟与驱使下以效率为动机不断地追求更多力量,这种求力的伦理即力量伦理导致了人类价值追求的单一化而使自由式微。在教学中,技术从显性与隐性两个层面控制着教学,使其在追求效率优位的过程中遭遇了自由危机。在埃吕尔看来,要重拾被技术遮蔽的自由,需要人们共同追寻一种非力量伦理来实现对技术自主的控制,而正确认识、理性反思、自觉践行、多方协同是在教学中建构非力量伦理的基本途径。Jacques Ellul believes that technology as efficiency, environment and system is not simply controlled by human beings,but contains obvious autonomy. In the technological world, human beings pursue more power with efficiency motivation under the coercion and impetus of technological consciousness. This kind of striving ethics, that is, power ethics, leads to the simplification of human value pursuit and the decline of freedom. For teaching, technology controls teaching from two aspects: explicit and implicit,which makes it encounter freedom crisis in the process of pursuing the superiority of efficiency. In Jacques Ellul’s view, to regain the freedom covered by technology, human beings need to pursue a Non-Power ethics to achieve the control of technology autonomy.Correct understanding, rational reflection, conscious practice and multi-subject cooperation are the four necessary ways for the construction of non-power ethics in teaching.
分 类 号:G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200