检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧超荣[1] OU Chao-rong(Guangdong Justice Police Vocational College,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510520)
出 处:《司法警官职业教育研究》2022年第3期51-58,共8页Vocational Education Research of Judicial Police
基 金:广东司法警官职业学院第四届院级一般课题“我国刑事辩护法律援助制度研究”(2020YB14)
摘 要:《法律援助法》规定死刑复核案件被告人,有权获得法律援助,法律援助制度得到较大发展。但《刑事诉讼法》对于死刑复核程序规定较为简单,对于被告人及其律师的辩护权行使内容缺乏具体详细规定。死刑复核案件缺乏程序保障,律师执业权利行使障碍重重,而被告人接受法律援助要“以提出申请为限”,其辩护权难以保障。未来死刑复核程序被告人应当无条件获得法律援助,提高法律援助质量,保障被告人辩护权充分有效行使,体现司法公正。As stipulated in the Law of Legal Aid,the defendants in review cases of death penalty are entitled to legal aid,which demonstrates a giant step in the legal aid system.On the contrary,the provisions in the Criminal Procedure Law concerning the review procedures of death penalty tend to be relatively simple and short of specific and detailed provisions on the exercise of the defense rights of either the defendants or their lawyers.Without procedural protection,a lawyer’s right to practice would be obstructed in the death penalty review cases while the defendant’s right to be defensed could not be guaranteed since the legal aid is restricted by"application only".In the future,the defendants in the death penalty review procedure should enjoy unconditional access to legal aid so as to improve the quality of legal assistance,ensure the complete and effective exercise of the defendant’s right to defense,and ultimately demonstrate the legal justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.48.34