检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马骁[1] 王玉玲[2] 石海燕[1] 万军[1] 李园[1] 敖勇琴 MA Xiao;WANG Yuling;SHI Haiyan;WAN Jun;LI Yuan;AO Yongqin(Department of Gastroenterology,the Second Medical Center,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Health Service Training Center,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Health Service Department of Guard Bureau of the Joint Staff Depatment,Beijing 100034,China)
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院第二医学中心消化内科,北京100853 [2]解放军总医院卫勤训练中心,北京100853 [3]联参警卫局卫生保健处,北京100034
出 处:《武警医学》2022年第11期941-944,共4页Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
基 金:军队护理创新与培育专项计划培育项目(2021HL083)
摘 要:目的探讨食管阻抗-pH监测技术在鼻胃管管饲高龄患者中的应用价值。方法选取2021-11至2022-04解放军总医院第二医学中心胃肠功能室行24 h食管阻抗-pH监测的高龄患者35例,按进食方式分为胃管管饲组(n=19)和经口摄食组(n=16),采用队列研究的方法比较各监测指标上的差异,总结鼻胃管管饲高龄老年人的反流特征。结果胃管管饲组与经口摄食组反流物性质占比存在差异(P<0.05),胃管管饲组液体反流比例较高,经口摄食组气体反流较多。反流高度上,胃管管饲组近端反流百分比明显高于经口摄食组[83.70%(71.20%~93.80%)vs 62.85%(37.83%~76.78%),P<0.05]。酸相关参数(酸反流时间、酸反流次数,酸暴露时间百分比、长反流次数、最长反流时间、餐后酸暴露时间百分比)比较无统计学差异。结论鼻胃管管饲高龄患者胃食管反流的类型以液体反流为主,食管阻抗-pH监测对该人群的反流评估、精准用药、肠内营养支持策略的制定具有指导意义。Objective To explore the clinical Value of esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH(MII-pH)monitoring in the elderly with nasogastric tube feeding.Methods Thirty-five elderly patients were divided into gastric tube feeding group(n=19)and oral feeding group(n=16)according to the feeding mode who underwent esophageal MII-pH 24 hours monitoring in the Gastrointestinal function Unit of the Second Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from November 2021 to April 2022.DeMeester score,pathological reflux and other monitoring index were compared between the two groups to summarize the reflux characteristics of the elderly fed by nasogastric tube.Results In the gastric tube group,the proportion of liquid reflux and percentage of proximal reflux were higher than those of oral group,83.70%(71.20%,93.80%)vs.62.85%(37.83%,76.78%)and the differences were statistically significant(Z=-4.537,-2.914,P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the acid reflux time,number of acid reflux,AET,number of long reflux,longest reflux time and AET of 2 h postprandial between the two groups.Conclusions Liquid reflux is the main type of gastroesophageal reflux in elderly patients with tube feeding.Esophageal MII-pH monitoring is of great significance for reflux evaluation,precision medicine and formulation of enteral nutrition support strategy in this population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222