“帝国”如何可能,有何新变——20年后重访哈特与奈格里的《帝国》  

How“Empire”is Possible and What’s New——Revisiting Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s Empire after 20 Years

作　　者：朱兆斌 Zhaobin ZHU(Peking University)

机构地区：[1]北京大学艺术学院

出　　处：《马克思主义美学研究》2023年第1期210-224,443-444,共17页Research on Marxist Aesthetics

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义文学理论关键词及当代意义研究”(18ZDA275)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在哈特与奈格里的《帝国》出版20年之后,当代资本主义的全球秩序呈现出他们并未完全预知的新变:传统的民族国家与帝国主义仍然在政治、经济、军事、宗教等方面突显着决定性作用,而数字技术在21世纪的迅速发展则进一步展现着“帝国”所指对象的新变。我们有必要重访《帝国》,一方面从生命政治、权力逻辑及其自身的免疫力出发来认清“帝国”如何可能,另一方面与斯蒂格勒、斯洛特戴克和库比特的代表性成果加以比对,从“超级工业时代”“电子全球化”与“数字化管控”出发来考察当代资本主义全球秩序有何新变。我们会在这一过程中发现,哈特与奈格里的部分看法已经因时代的新变而不再有效,我们必须在当今的全球状况中不断进行及时的思考。20 years after the publication of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s Empire,the global order of contemporary capitalism shows new changes that they did not fully anticipate:the traditional nation-state and imperialism still play a decisive role in politics,economy,military and religion,while the rapid development of digital technology in the 21st century further shows new changes in the object of“Empire”.It is necessary to revisit Empire.On the one hand,we should recognize how“Empire”is possible from the perspective of life politics,the logic of power and its own immunity.On the other hand,we should compare it with the representative achievements of Bernard Stiegler,Peter Sloterdijk and Sean Cubit,and explore how the contemporary capitalist global order has changed in light of the“hyper-industrial age”,“electronic globalization”and“digital control”.In this process,we will find that some of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s judgments are no longer valid due to the new changes of the times.We must constantly make timely reflections in today’s global situation.

关 键 词：帝国 哈特 奈格里 数字技术 当代资本主义 

分 类 号：D033.3[政治法律—政治学]