亲告罪追诉机制的反思与重构——基于文本与实证的双重分析  

Rethinking and Reconstructing the Prosecution Mechanism of Personal Accusation

作　　者：陈肖 Chen Xiao

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院

出　　处：《贸大法律评论》2021年第1期244-254,共11页Uibe Legal Science

摘　　要：当代国家追诉主义下的亲告罪自诉机制,旨在实现被害人利益保护的法律价值。然而,刑事审判模式变化所带来的程序性问题,致使亲告罪案件的自诉人陷入权利救济的困境。为检视亲告罪的追诉困境,通过对法律文本和裁判实证的双重研究发现:告诉才处理并不应当等同于刑事自诉,将两者混淆会加重刑事自诉人的证明责任,既不利于对被害人诉权的实现,也无疑与亲告罪的立法意旨背道而驰。我国对于亲告罪的追诉机制在个罪中已有突破,因而,据此强化刑事调解制度和引入综合主义追诉机制有助于破除亲告罪被害人诉权实现的困境,也暗合亲告罪的立法意旨和法律价值。The private prosecution mechanism of private prosecution under contemporary national prosecutionism aims to realize the legal value of protecting the interests of victims.However,the procedural problems brought about by the change of the criminal trial mode make private prosecutors in private prosecution cases fall into the dilemma of rights relief.In order to examine the prosecution dilemma of the crime of private prosecution,through the dual research of legal texts and empirical judgments,it is found that the processing should not be equated to criminal private prosecution.Confusing the two will increase the burden of proof for the criminal private prosecutor,which is not conducive to the prosecution.The realization of the victim’s right to sue is undoubtedly contrary to the legislative intent of the crime of private prosecution.Since my country’s prosecution mechanism for private indictment crimes has made breakthroughs in individual crimes,the strengthening of the criminal mediation system and the introduction of comprehensive prosecution mechanisms will help break the predicament of the realization of the rights of prosecution by the victims of private indictment crimes.Legislative intent and legal value.

关 键 词：亲告罪 刑事自诉 被害人保护 刑事调解 综合主义追诉机制 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]