轴承与环砥石争议再辨析  

Re-analysis on the Dispute with Bearing and Ring Whetstone

作　　者：李永强[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院考古研究所

出　　处：《南方文物》2019年第6期108-116,共9页Cultural Relics in Southern China

摘　　要："轴承说"与"环砥石说"基于不同的原理,其背后是对治玉技术背景的不同理解。但二者在器物形态和磨损痕迹上具有一定的相似性,因此要准确区分,就必须找到二者之间最根本的区别特征。通过两种基于不同认识进行的相关实验考古结果对比,对我们的辨析工作有所启示。具体分析目前发现的该类石器,环砥石说显得更有说服力。史前新石器时代目前尚未发现治玉技术中有确切可信的全圆周运动证据,历史时期记载的治玉机械,也应该是以半旋转运动简单机械为基础改进而成。The hypothesis about rotary bearing and the hypothesis about ring stone are based on different principles,and behind it is a different understanding of the technical background of the jade production.However,the two have certain similarities in the shape and wear marks of the objects.Therefore,in order to distinguish accurately,it is necessary to find the most fundamental difference between the two.The comparison of two archaeological experiment results based on different understandings has implications for our analysis.Specific analysis of the current class of stone tools,the ring stone is more convincing.In the prehistoric Neolithic Age,there is no evidence of complete and circular motion in the jade production technology.The jade-made machinery recorded in the historical period should also be improved based on the semi-rotating motion simple machine.

关 键 词：辘轳轴承器 环砥石 研磨器 治玉技术 

分 类 号：K876.2[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]