检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨玉琴 王震[2] 张晓明 张晶晶[2] 谢加力 YANG Yuqin;WANG Zhen;ZHANG Xiaoming;ZHANG Jingjing;XIE Jiali(Department of Pharmacy,Wuhu Second People’s Hospital,Wuhu 241000,China;Consumption of Internal,Wuhu Second People’s Hospital,Wuhu 241000,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院药剂科,芜湖241000 [2]安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院消化内科,芜湖241000
出 处:《中国临床药学杂志》2022年第5期371-375,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
基 金:芜湖市第二人民医院院内科研项目(编号2016A03)
摘 要:目的比较埃索美拉唑与奥美拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血(PUB)的临床疗效。方法前瞻性纳入2020年1月至2021年12月收治的PUB患者160例,随机分为对照组(n=80)和观察组(n=80)。对照组给予奥美拉唑治疗,观察组给予埃索美拉唑治疗。治疗过程中测定并对比分析2组患者胃内酸性水平及患者CYP2C19等位基因(*2,*3,*17),比较2组患者的临床疗效、住院时间、30 d内的再出血率和不良反应事件发生率。结果观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(96.25%vs 78.75%,P<0.01);快代谢型患者中,观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(93.10%vs 56.25%,P<0.01)。2组患者24 h内胃内平均p H差异无统计学意义,但胃内p H达4.0、6.0的时间,及p H>4.0和>6.0的持续时间百分率之间差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组住院时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05),但2组患者30 d内再出血率、不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义。结论采用埃索美拉唑治疗PUB的临床疗效优于奥美拉唑。AIM To compare the clinical efficacy between esomeprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding(PUB).METHODS A total of 160 patients with PUB admitted to our hospital from January 2020to December 2021 were enrolled prospectively and randomly divided into 2 groups,with 80 patients in each group.The control group was given omeprazole treatment,and the observation group was given esomeprazole treatment.During treatment,gastric acid level and CYP2C19 allele(*2,*3,*17)of patients in 2 groups were measured and compared.The differences of effective rate,hospitalization time,rebleeding rate within 30 d and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between 2 groups.RESULTS The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group(96.25%vs 78.75%,P<0.01).In extensive metabolizer(EM)type patients,the total effective rate in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group(93.10%vs 56.25%,P<0.01).There was no statistical difference in average gastric pH within 24 h between 2 groups,but there were significant differences between the time when the intra gastric pH reached to 4.0 and 6.0,and the percentage of the duration of pH>4.0 and>6.0(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05),but there were no significant differences in the rate of rebleeding within 30 d and the occurrence of adverse reactions.CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy of esomeprazole in the treatment of PUB is better than that of omeprazole.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3