检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李丽[1] LI Li(Jing Hengyi School of Education,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学经亨颐教育学院,浙江杭州311121
出 处:《高等教育研究》2022年第7期99-109,共11页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(22NDQN268YB)
摘 要:对于如何在“寒门贵子”个体的升迁与其阶层群体的社会流动之间建立联系,英国理查德·霍加特的“奖学金男孩”研究可以为我们提供一种域外的参照。在阶层旅行的过程中,“奖学金男孩”在文化上失去了平衡,在阶级归属上遭到了双重流放,成为“浮游无根”的一代。霍加特希望通过改变既有教育模式和标准,将“奖学金男孩”培养成具有阶级使命的“热忱的少数人”,并进一步启迪和教育大众,从而推进社会的民主与平等。霍加特的“奖学金男孩”研究,在理论视角、研究方法和价值逻辑方面具有自己的特色,与我国的底层文化资本理论既有呼应之处也有不同之处,能够为我国的“寒门贵子”研究提供一定的借鉴。How to establish a connection between the promotion of an individual with a poor family and the social mobility of the class groups?Richard Hoggart’s“scholarship boys”study provides us with a comparison of exotic experiences.In the process of class travel,scholarship boys lost their cultural balance,suffered double exile in class belonging,and became a generation uprooted by education.Hoggart would like to promote the democratization of education by changing the existing education models and standards,and cultivate scholarship boys into“earnest minority”with class missions,and enlighten and educate the public,thereby promoting social democracy and equality.Hoggart’s“scholarship boys”study has its own characteristics in terms of theoretical perspective,research methods and value orientation.It has echoes and differences with the domestic“underclass cultural capital”theory,which could provide a certain enlightenment for the study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15