高空抛物罪主观罪过形式的教义学分析  

Doctrinal Analysis of the Subjective Sin Form of the Crime of Throwing Objects at High Altitude

作　　者：王志祥 李昊天 WANG Zhi-xiang;LI Hao-tian(College of Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《河北法学》2022年第10期40-58,共19页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“形式理性与实质理性的关系在刑法学中的展开研究”(21BFX009)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：依据我国《刑法》关于故意犯罪和过失犯罪的规定,对于主观罪过形式,应当以行为人对危害结果的态度为标准进行判断。而危害结果是对法益的侵犯所造成的后果。结合高空抛物罪在刑法分则体系中所处的位置,该罪的保护法益应当是社会公共秩序。因此,高空抛物行为的危害结果应当是对社会公共秩序的破坏所造成的结果,具体而言就是对处于高空的人不得随意抛掷物品的社会共识性规则的破坏所造成的结果。该结果属于非物质性结果,与行为同时发生。行为人对该结果的态度系出于希望或放任。所以,高空抛物罪的主观罪过形式应当是故意。According to the provisions concerning intentional crime and negligent crime in China’s Criminal Law,the perpetrator’s attitude towards harmful results should be taken as the standard to judge the subjective sin form.The harmful result is the consequence of the infringement of legal interests.Combined with the position of the crime of throwing objects at high altitude in the system of specific provisions of criminal law,the protected legal interests of this crime should be social public order.Therefore,the harmful result of the act of throwing objects at high altitude should be the consequence caused by the destruction of social public order,specifically the consequence caused by the destruction of the social consensus rule that people at high altitude are not allowed to throw objects at will.This result is non-material and occurs simultaneously with the act.The actor wishes or allows this result to occur.Therefore,the subjective sin form of the crime of throwing objects at high altitude should be intentional.

关 键 词：高空抛物罪 主观罪过形式 危害结果 法益 社会公共秩序 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]