盗窃罪以非法占有为目的的教义学重释  

The Dogmatic Reinterpretation for the Purpose of Illegal Possession in Larceny

作　　者：薛铁成 丁晓晗 XUE Tie-cheng;DING Xiao-han(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210008;People's Procuratorate of Longyao County,Hebei Province,Xingtai 055350,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210008 [2]河北省隆尧县人民检察院第三检察部,河北邢台055350

出　　处：《河北法学》2022年第6期185-200,共16页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：我国以非法占有为目的的盗窃罪解释进路,借鉴德、日刑法理论的研究成果,既从内容上区分盗窃罪与毁坏财物罪,又从需罚性角度划定盗窃罪的处罚范围。这一解释进路,虽促进盗窃罪理论研究成果的体系化和科学化;但在理论构造、概念体系和判断逻辑方面还存在问题。当下盗窃罪的解释进路,第一,应当在维持排除和利用、处分意思的基础上,引入“法的责任论”,以行为人的自由意志作为前提,将不具有期待可能性的盗窃行为排除在构成要件之外。第二,应当构建“过错的排除和利用、处分意思”概念体系,确保刑罚权的发动不是对犯罪行为的激情反应,而是对犯罪行为的理性应对。第三,应当遵从“由主观到客观的判断逻辑”,通过转移占有的实质化判断标准,利用排除意思,将行为人主观预设的、使用妨害程度较低的盗窃行为排除在构成要件符合性之外。The interpretation approach of larceny for the purpose of illegal possession draws lessons from the theoretical research results of excluding and using the meaning of punishment in Germany and Japan.It not only distinguishes larceny from the crime of destroying property in content,but also divides the scope of larceny and impunity from the perspective of punishment,which promotes the systematization and scientization of the theoretical research results of larceny.However,this interpretation approach lacks in-depth research in theoretical structure,conceptual system and judgment logic.On the basis of the existing interpretation approach of larceny for the purpose of illegal possession,that is,on the basis of maintaining the intention of exclusion and use of punishment,we should introduce the theory of responsibility of law,which is committed to the possibility that the perpetrator can carry out other acts on the premise of his freedom of decision when excluding and using the intention of punishment,so as to lay the foundation for backward looking responsibility condemnation that may be condemned by responsibility,The theft without expectation possibility is excluded from the constitutive elements.Construct the conceptual system of fault elimination and utilization punishment to ensure that the initiation of punishment is not a passionate response to criminal acts,but a rational response.Following the judgment logic from subjective to objective and through the judgment standard of substantive transfer of possession,the theft behavior in the situation where the perpetrator’s subjective preset use is less harmful is not punishable due to the lack of exclusion intention.

关 键 词：非法占有为目的 排除意思 利用处分 非决定论 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]