被追诉人权利保障机制的结构性缺陷及其矫正——以认罪认罚案件为中心  

Structural Defects and its Reference of the Right Security Mechanism of the Accused——Centered on Cases of Pleading Guilt and Accepting Penalty

作　　者：崔玮 CUI Wei

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院 [2]郑州大学检察公益诉讼研究院、中国司法案例研究中心

出　　处：《北方法学》2022年第3期109-120,共12页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“海洋检察监督机制研究”(GJ2021C04);司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖的实现模式研究”(19SFB2034)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着认罪认罚从宽制度的逐步完善,被追诉人权利保障机制形成了以审判机关、检察机关、侦查机关和被追诉人四主体为“端点”、主体之间权利(力)关系为“连线”的等边平行四边形关系结构。通过考察发现,被追诉人权利保障机制在权利明确性、量刑协商主体地位、量刑优惠规范和权利救济程序等方面存在结构性缺陷。规范层面对效率至上的片面追求、实践层面中被追诉人诉讼客体认识的残留和法理层面的合理性内在冲突是背后的成因。强化认罪认罚案件被追诉人的权利保障,应以被追诉人权利保障机制为框架,在近期明确完善被追诉人的权利赋予,在远期推进审前阶段司法型程序性救济模式构建、拓展审判阶段权利救济型程序性救济模式,并最终塑造具有现代法治意义的司法救济模式。With the gradual improvement of the plea system,the mechanism of guaranteeing the rights of the pursued person in plea cases has formed an equilateral parallelogram structure with the trial organ,the procuratorial organ and the investigative organ and the accused as the main bodies.Through the examination,it is found that the mechanism for guaranteeing the rights of the accused presents structural defects in terms of clarity of rights,equal status of sentencing consultation,preferential norms of sentencing and rights relief procedures.The one-sided pursuit of efficiency supremacy,the residual recognition of the object of litigation by the accused and the inherent conflict of legal norm rationality are the causes behind.To strengthen the protection of the rights of the accused in plea cases,we should take the protection mechanism of the rights of the accused as the framework,and clearly improve the rights of the accused in the near future;while in the long term,we should promote the construction of judicial-type procedural relief mode in the pre-trial stage,expand the procedural relief mode of rights relief in the trial stage,and finally shape the judicial relief mode with the significance of modern rule of law.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 被追诉人 权利保障 权利救济 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]