法院附设调解制度与法院调解制度之比较  

The Comparative Study of Court-annexed Mediation and Court-mediation System

作　　者：毛兴平[1] 刘艳芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,合肥230039

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2007年第2期105-107,共3页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：美国法院附设调解是当事人之间运用协商方式在中立第三人(调解人)的帮助下达成和解的纠纷解决方式,它可分为“强制性”和“自愿性”两种类型。我国法院调解制度与美、日法院附设调解制度存在本质上的区别。我们应当从赋予当事人程序选择权;建立前置性调解程序;遵循自愿、合法与效率的原则;赋予调解协议的法律效力等多方面来完善我国法院调解制度。Court-annexed mediation in America is one of dispute resolutions by negotiation between the parties with the help of a neutral third party(mediator).it could be classified as "compulsory" and "voluntary".Our court-mediation system is essentially different from court-annexed mediation in America and Japan.We should give the parties the right to choose procedures;build up mediation procedure before trial;abide by voluntariness,legality and efficiency;entrust power to the mediation agreemen...

关 键 词：ADR 法院附设调解 法院调解 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]