内关、足三里穴不同定位法实测比较  

Comparison on location with different methods from somatometry on Neiguan and Zusanli

作　　者：蔡荣林[1] 胡玲[1] 李梦[1] 陈卫华[1] 孟云凤[1] 吴子建[1] 李姿慧[1] 陈赟[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽中医学院,安徽合肥230038

出　　处：《针灸临床杂志》2007年第8期7-9,共3页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：国家中医药管理局中医药标准化项目;编号:ZYYS-200。

摘　　要：目的:比较内关、足三里穴的几种指寸法与骨度分寸法定位之间的差异,探讨四肢部腧穴准确而简便的定位方法。方法:随机选择100名健康成年志愿者(18～25岁),男女各半,采用体重秤、人体测高仪、圆杆直角规、电子数显游标卡尺等标准测量仪器,测量受试者的身高、体重、肘横纹至腕横纹的距离、膝中至外踝尖的距离、拇指同身寸、中指同身寸、四指横寸,比较内关穴、足三里穴骨度分寸定位与手指比量定位的差异。结果:内关穴的骨度分寸法定位与一夫法(横指同身寸法)比较无差异(P>0.05),足三里穴的骨度分寸法定位与一夫法比较差异性不显著(P>0.01),而两穴骨度分寸定位与中指同身寸、拇指同身寸定位法比较均差异性显著(P<0.01)。结论:内关、足三里穴的骨度分寸定位与一夫法定位接近,与中指同身寸法及拇指同身寸法定位相差较大。提示四肢部腧穴的指寸法定位以一夫法较为准确,可用其作为临床参考定位方法。Objective:To find a optimized method of location of acu- points on limbs.Methods:100 cases of healthy adults were measured to observe the difference of location between bone-length measurement and individual cun of Neiguan(PC 6)and Zusanli(ST36).Results: The location with bone-length measurement of Neiguan(PC 6)had no statistical significance compared with that of Yifufa(P>0.05). And location with bone-length measurement of Zusanli(ST 36)had quiet variability compared with that d Yifufa(P>0.01).Conclusion The location with bone-length measurement of Neiguan(PC 6)and Zusanli(ST 36)are approximation with that d Yifufa,and the loca- tion of acupoints on limbs with Yifufa is better than that d other methods of individual cun.

关 键 词：内关 足三里 手指比量法 骨度分寸法 腧穴定位 

分 类 号：R224.2[医药卫生—中医基础理论]