检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林忠志[1]
机构地区:[1]福建政法管理干部学院法律系,福建福州350007
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2006年第6期53-55,共3页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
摘 要:死刑是一个存在了几千年的古老刑种,有关死刑存废的争议已持续了二百多年。我国虽然是一个保留死刑的国家,但是死刑在我国应严格限制。因为我国已加入了有关严格限制死刑的国际公约。另外,从保护人权的角度,也要求我们限制死刑。为此,我国的刑事诉讼中有关死刑案件的审理程序要进行相关改革,如增加刑种﹑在诉讼程序中更加注重保护被告人的人权﹑加大死刑案件法律援助的力度等。上述措施是为了确保死刑案件的公正审理和判决,同时达到限制死刑的目的。Beginning from its origin,the death penalty has already had the history of thousands of years,Reservation or abolition question of death penalty has also been argued for more than 200 years.China has been enforcing the policy of 'retaining death penalty and a cautious sentence of death',because human rights should be concerned more and China has joined some international treaties of retaining death penalty.The existing judicial administration of death penalty in China fails to meet the general rules of justice,lacks the particularities which the due process is expected to have and is too simplified and inexpensive.Some policy have been changed,including the process of death penalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15