检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭新林[1]
出 处:《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第6期109-112,共4页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
摘 要:我国对私放在押人员罪的刑法规制和理论评价总体上而言是比较科学合理的,主要表现在从广义意义上来理解本罪的犯罪主体、对行为方式的规定采取概括综述式的表述方式以及对犯罪对象“在押人员”内涵的合理限定等几个方面。我国应吸收外国刑法及其理论中的合理因素,扬弃我们的不足成分,重点应该正确厘定该罪的主观罪责,调整对该罪罪质的类属评价。As far as Crime of Releasing Personnel in Custody without Authorization is concerned,the Criminal ruling and theoretic appraisal on this Crime is scientific and rational in our Country as a whole,which is mainly embody in the following aspects: the understanding of Crime subject in a broad sense,the stipulation of behavioral forms in a general narration,as well as the rational defining of connotation about 'personnel in custody',and so on.But meanwhile,we should absorb the rational ingredients of foreign Criminal legislation and theory so as to make our Criminal legislation and relevant theory perfect.The key point is,the correct defining of the subject sin,the adjusting of the appraisal on quality of this Crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38