论“教材模式”对民国时期美术史研究的影响  

The Influence of the “teaching material pattern” on the Study of Fine Arts History in the Era of Republic of China

作　　者：胡志平[1] 赵瑛[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学中国艺术研究所,浙江杭州310028 [2]绥化日报社,黑龙江绥化156000

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（艺术版）》2004年第2期16-20,共5页Journal of Guizhou University Art Edition

摘　　要：二十世纪上半叶 ,各类新式美术学校相继成立 ,与之相应的具有现代形态的美术史教材也纷纷问世。此类教材多采用新式体例 ,以新眼光、新学识来编撰中国美术史。除了注重史实准确 ,取材精审外 ,尤重史观。尽管教材所容纳的史学理论因传递知识的需要 ,它有别于专门性的美术史学著作选取的路径 ,构成对我国早期美术史研究产生影响的“教材模式”。In the first half of the 20th Century, various new schools of fine arts established. In response to this, many new types of teaching materials for the history of fine arts came into existence. Such materials had new styles with new insight and knowledge edited in the history of Chinese fine arts. Besides precise historical facts and well chosen materials, more emphasis was laid on historicality. In need of transferring knowledge, the path of discussing the theories of history in the materials was different from some specialized works on the history of fine arts. Thus came the “teaching material pattern” that had influence on the early research of the history of fine arts.

关 键 词：教材模式 中国美术史 影响 

分 类 号：J120.9[艺术—艺术理论]