检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药导报》2006年第6期3-5,共3页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的以活性炭作为吸附剂,确定阿霉素在血液灌流法治疗肝癌时所用吸附剂的最佳用量,以减少阿霉素的毒副作用。方法采用含阿霉素的血浆灌注于不同组合量的活性炭柱,用柱切换高效液相色谱法测定阿霉素的灌注前后血药浓度。结果A组(150g×1支)、B组(150g×2支)、C组(150g×3支)、D组(150g×4支)及E组(150g×5支)活性炭柱对阿霉素的吸附率分别为20.19%、27.60%、55.98%、56.42%、57.13%,经方差分析有极显著性差异,经两两比较的q检验,C、D及E组间无显著性差异。结论除D组与E组P>0.05外,其它三个低剂量活性炭组中任意两组皆为P<0.01,故150g×3支活性炭柱为活性炭吸附剂的最佳用量,该用量的确定为血液灌流法治疗肝癌提供了理论依据。Objective To make sure the best dosage of sorbent which adsorbed Adriamicin(ADM) by activated carbon in hemoperfusion therapy the liver cancer , in order to reduce side effect of ADM.Methods The blood plasma of ADM was perfusioned in the activated carbon columns which contanted the different combination.The blood concentration of ADM was determined by column switching HPLC. Results The adsorption ratio of ADM by A group(150g×1)、B group(150g×2)、C group(150g×3)、D group(150g×4)及E group(150g×5) activated carbon columns were 20.19%、27.60%、55.98%、56.42%、57.13%.The mean difference is significant at the 0.01 level by ANOVA. It was no difference significant at the 0 .05 leve between groups of C,D and E by post hoc multiple comparisons.Conclusion There were difference significant at the 0.01 leve between any two of three groups of low dosage activate carbon(p<0.01), expect D and E group( p>0.05). The best dosage of activate carbon column was 150g×3 . To make sure the dosage provided theoretics basis for therapy the liver cancer by hemoperfusion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63