检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚红军[1]
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2002年第3期37-43,共7页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
摘 要:人民法院独立行使审判权的宪法原则一直未能实现制度上的保障。其原因固然是多方面的,但是,最根本的是因为缺乏理论创新的勇气、宏观上的设计和合理的路径选择。The constitutional principle of independently exercising adjudicative power by the people's courts in Chi- na has not really guaranteed in the constitution due to various reasons but the most fundamental of the reasons lies in the fact that we are in short of gallantry in creating something novel,a macro-design as well as a rational route.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30