检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第4期13-16,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:长期以来 ,由于受到实体法和诉讼法关系“主从论”的影响 ,诉讼法一直被看作是实现实体法的形式和手段 ,因而诉讼法的工具价值被看作其根本价值 ,而忽视了诉讼法的内在价值。随着对诉讼法理论研究的深入 ,诉讼法的内在价值 ,即独立价值越来越为学者们所关注。在探讨诉讼法和实体法的关系时 ,应抛弃固有的孰主孰从 ,孰上孰下的思维模式 ,立足于揭示它们之间客观的内在的联系 ,提高人们对诉讼法和实体法之间关系的认识。Over a long period of time,for the influence of 'the theory of principal subordinary',procedural law has been always regarded as the form and instrument to implement substantial law. So instrumental value has been thought as the procedural law's rudimentary value,and it's intrinsic value has been overlooked. Along with the development of the theory of procedural law,many academicians begin to give their attentions to the procedural law's intrinsic value,namely,absolute value. When we investigate the relation between procedural law and substanltin law,the inherent model of thought about which is more primary and which is more superior should be discarded,and we should be established in disclosing their objective and intrinsic relation of them to promote people's cognition about the relation of procedural law and substantive law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13