论行政证据与行政诉讼证据的相异及衔接  

The Differences And Relations Between Administrative Evidence And Administrative Procedural Evidence

作　　者：张芳[1] 张艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第5期28-31,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：行政证据与行政诉讼证据既相区别又相联系 ,并且存在较多衔接关系 ,从理论和实践上都有正确识别之必要。它们的相异主要表现在 :性质、目的、范围、证明对象、调查取证的阶段等方面。二者的衔接主要表现在 :行政诉讼的一部分证据来源于行政证据 ,二者都具有证据的基本属性、种类划分基本相同。区分行政证据和行政诉讼证据 ,不仅适应了法治行政的潮流 ,而且有助于树立现代法治和正当程序观念 。Administrative evidence and administrative procedural evidence, though quite different, are closely related. The differences between them mainly lie in the aspects of nature, target, realm, the object of evidence, the stage of investigation and obtaining evidence, while their relations reflect in such areas as part of administrative procedural evidence comes from administrative evidence, both having the characteristics of evidence, their classification are almost the same. Thus, the distinction of administrative evidence and administrative procedural evidence not only meets with the tendency of ruled-by-law administration, but helps to develop the concept of modern “rule of law” and proper procedure.

关 键 词：行政证据 行政诉讼证据 相异 衔接 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]