对我国行政诉讼举证责任的反思——以行政不作为诉讼为视角  

Reflection on the Burden of Proof on the Administrative Trial——From the Perspective of Administrative Omission

作　　者：杨德润[1] 李鹤贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津市高级人民法院立案一庭,天津300100

出　　处：《天津法学》2011年第2期53-57,共5页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：关于行政不作为诉讼的举证责任,在学界和司法实践中的理解与适用还存在诸多分歧。文章从分析举证责任和行政不作为行为的含义入手,对行政不作为诉讼的举证责任问题进行分析,分析过程紧紧围绕行政诉讼"限制公权、保护私权"的价值取向。通过对行政不作为诉讼举证责任的分析,明确提出行政不作为诉讼举证责任的基本原则与举证范围,实现对构建行政不作为诉讼举证责任体系的有益尝试,以期对审判实践有所裨益。There are a lot of diversions on the understandings and applications of the burden of proof in the administrative omission litigation both in theory and practice.In this article,the author firstly made a complete analysis on the meanings of the burden of proof and the administrative omission as well as the relevant problems,which is tightly around value orientation of "protecting the civil rights and restricting the public rights".By the analysis on the burden of proof in the administrative omission litigat...

关 键 词：行政不作为 举证责任 行政诉讼 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]